Pope Leo in Constantinople: Littleness, Love, and the Battle for the Human Heart

  1. Share
24 10

Pope Leo in Constantinople: Littleness, Love, and the Battle for the Human Heart

This is Pope Leo’s first apostolic journey, and on Friday 28 November he spoke in the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit in Istanbul to the Catholic Christians of Turkey.

Let me declare an interest. I have found the years since my reception into the Catholic Church difficult in the years of the previous papacy. When Leo was elected my heart entertained the possibility of hope, the hope of being able to love, honour and respect both the pope and his office. In the months that have followed, we have all been on tenterhooks wondering who God had given us. I have tried to see the best in him. I have tried to interpret his words without fear, threat, or paranoia. And I believed I saw a great goodness and above all the great love of Jesus.

I have no doubt that being fully human, Pope Leo will make mistakes, take decisions I would have preferred not taken, and actions I may not fully understand. But what I most need in a pope is someone who knows, understands and loves Jesus. And in this visit to what I prefer to call Constantinople, I found we had such a pope.

As I listened to him in this Istanbul cathedral, I found myself loving the pope, loving Jesus in him, thanking God for the presence of the Holy Spirit that so clearly emanated from our Holy Father in God.

Immersed in the febrile politics of the Church, we have been consumed with power struggles, political innuendo, theological tribalism, and the death grip of our own hidden and occluded anxieties. As I listened to the pope speak to persecuted Catholics in Turkey, people who have paid a very high price for loving Jesus and remaining faithful to the See of Peter, I found myself loving what he brought to the world stage in the name of Jesus.

In my semi-suspended optimism up until this point, I have been accused by people more frightened of the future than I am, of “popesplaining.” I do not mind the accusations. But what I want to do is celebrate a pope who truly loves Jesus, deeply loves His Church, honours our Lady, Theotokos (first so called in Ephesus, Turkey), and the little ones, the members of the body of Christ, who hold the faith.

I thought we might pay our pope the compliment of listening to what he actually said in the Cathedral of the Holy Spirit, rather than what others say about him.

The Pope’s Opening Gesture: Rooting the Journey in Salvation History

Most of us like to establish our credentials, our provenance when we speak: where our journey began, how far our memory stretches, how long we have been doing this.

The pope, speaking in the name of the Catholic Church reached back to Abraham, sent out from Ur of the Chaldees, and then from “the region of Harran in the south of Turkey he left for the promised land” (Genesis 12.1).

“Why is Turkey important?” he asked. The covenant journey began with Abraham, but soon “in the fullness of time, after Jesus’ death and resurrection, the disciples came to Anatolia, Turkey. In Antioch, where St Ignatius was later bishop, they were called Christians for the first time” (Acts 11.26). From that city St Paul began some of his apostolic journeys. It was likewise in Ephesus, on the shores of the Aegean, that John the beloved disciple lived and died. Turkey is a foundational part of the earliest memory of the childhood of the Church.

Why does this matter? The history of Turkey should cause us to reflect where we have come to as Christians in the 21st century.

It is a history of miracle and tragedy. It is a reminder that in part through our frailty, we have betrayed the faith of our fathers. Christian schisms in the Near East significantly weakened the social, political, and theological cohesion of the Christian world just before and during the rise of Islam. This did not “cause” Islam, but it created conditions that made Islamic expansion easier and Christian resistance far less unified.Asia Minor used to be the heart-throb of the early Church, and it has been surrendered to the power of Islam and the replacement of the God and Father of Jesus Christ by a very different, darker, prophetic figure.

In reminding us of this, the pope also reminded us that Jesus is Lord of history. This is the antidote to our fear and failure. Jesus is the antidote to all that breaks in the human heart. But before we can reach out to him in deeper trust, we need to recognise our failure.

Nicaea still asks us: Who is Jesus for us? What does it essentially mean to be a Christian?

The great struggle between Islam and Christianity is the archetypal struggle between power and love. Mohammed is the prophet of power. Jesus the Son of God is the incarnation of love. Across the skin of the earth, in the constant tension between Islam and Christianity, power and love meet in perpetual struggle, and the prize is the human heart.

Put like this, the outcome is clear. The human heart was made for Jesus, not for power. Though we lust after control and security, God has placed in us an even deeper hunger for his love, his forgiveness, his mercy, and the kindness of his eyes.

Littleness: The Virtue the Future Requires

The human heart was made for Jesus, not for power.

For those who remember Cardinal Ratzinger’s prophetic warning, he reminded us that the Church would be stripped of much of its weight, size, and influence, and would have to learn a new mode of being: littleness. Leo echoed him.

Speaking to a small, fragile, and at times frightened community of Catholics in Turkey, he said:

“When we look with God’s eyes, we discover he has chosen the way of littleness, descending in our midst. This is the way of the Lord, which we are all called to bear witness.”

Incarnation is the abandonment of control. When we think of the journey from the glory of heaven into the vulnerability of flesh folded into history, we remember that God is not afraid of powerlessness or littleness. Jesus walked the earth with nothing in his hands but blessing and nothing in his heart but the power to forgive sins and raise the dead. The power of Christianity is in inverse proportion to its capacity to control.

We, by contrast, often react to fear by reaching for the levers of control instead of falling to our knees in prayer. Littleness is the theological virtue that corrects us.

Pope Leo said:

“The Church’s true strength does not lie in her resources or structures, or in the fruits of her mission depending on numbers, economic power or social influence. The Church lives by the light of the Lamb.”

He encouraged his listeners to cultivate confident hope, rooted in union with God, and to witness with joy. And he reminded them that the young have begun to tire of materialism’s false promises, and are turning back to ask questions of those who live by the Lamb’s light.

Turkey as the Land of the Councils: A Strategic Spiritual Gesture

The pope then turned to the significance of Turkey as the land of the first eight ecumenical councils. It was an elegant move.

He then offered three challenges: to his audience of brave faithful Catholics; to the Orthodox clergy present; to the Turkish dignitaries; and to a world audience curious to know what the successor of Peter had to say in Asia Minor, in the 21st century.

Challenge One: Who Is Jesus for Us?

Christianity is not the story of man’s search for God but of God’s search for man.

The pope returned to the paradigm of power versus love and anchored it in the Creed of Nicaea.

“The Creed is not simply a doctrinal formula; it is an invitation to seek a different sensibility, a spiritual horizon… Nicaea still asks us: Who is Jesus for us? What does it essentially mean to be a Christian?”

Religion is often misunderstood as the pursuit of a dogma inflicted on others. Christianity is nothing of the sort. It is the pursuit of a relationship. Who is Jesus for us? The way love triumphs over power is through falling in love with Jesus. Evangelism achieves little by telling people what they must believe; it achieves much by finding the right questions: How do we bear being human? How do we distinguish evil from good? How do we overcome evil with good?

Everything flows from: Who is Jesus for us?

Challenge Two: Rediscovering the Face of the Father

The pope reminded his audience that Nicaea affirmed the full divinity of Jesus:

“In Jesus we find the true face of God and his definitive word about humanity and history.”

This challenges every human idea of God that does not correspond to Christ’s revelation. Every religion except Christianity emerges from the human mind and its spiritual chemistry. Christianity alone is God breaking in from outside.

As C. S. Lewis wrote:

“If Christianity were something we were making up, of course we could make it easier. But it is not made up… Christianity claims to give an account of facts, to tell you what the real universe is like…
Christianity is not the story of man’s search for God but of God’s search for man.”

This leads to the pope’s warning about the return of Arianism. Arianism demotes Jesus, relieving the human mind of the paradox of God and man united in one person. In doing so, it robs us of the power of the Cross to save.

Leo said that a new Arianism is present today whenever Jesus is admired as a merely human figure, a moral teacher, or a prophet, but not worshipped as the living God.

“Nicaea reminds us that Jesus Christ is not a figure of the past; he is the Son of God, present among us, guiding history.”

This matters enormously. Jesus is not a second-level authority. He is the voice of God the Father placed close to our ear and even closer to our heart.

Challenge Three: Translating Faith into Culture

The third challenge is translation: how we translate our relationship with Jesus into the cultures in which we live.

The pope reminded us that even the Creed itself received a renewed formulation at Constantinople. The lesson:

“The Christian faith must always be expressed in the languages and categories of the culture in which we live.”

He then invoked St John Henry Newman. One of the great arguments of the present moment is the extent to which some attempt to disguise fundamental doctrinal change by calling it development. Newman made crystal clear that no development is legitimate unless it is organically continuous with the original deposit. Development never becomes contradiction.

Those who feared Leo might be captured by progressivism should take comfort. He said:

“Its development is organic, that of a living reality gradually bringing to light and expressing more fully the essential heart of the faith.”

A Fisherman’s Image

He concluded with the image used by John XXIII, who watched fishermen on the Bosphorus working through the night in all weathers: perseverance, trust, labour, fidelity in the dark, waiting for dawn.

Pope Leo offered the same encouragement: to remain faithful, to work, to trust, and to allow Jesus to guide history.

What he brought to Turkey was not a visit high on diplomacy and sophisticated politicking, but a spiritual strategy for the renewal of the Church and the Faith.

There are few better ways than giving our attention to his three questions:

  • Who is Jesus?
  • How do we discover the face of our Father?
  • How do we translate the faith into culture without deforming it?

This is the means by which the Church may be reinvigorated by the glory of her past and grow more confident in God’s plans for her present.

Our pope, in returning to Nicaea, confronted both the triumphs and the failures of the Church, and offered Christ’s little ones in Constantinople hope, clarity, and courage to witness to God’s mercy in the present and trust his promises for the future. Once free of the preoccupations of politics we can return to the roots of why we are Christians and recover our vision for the Kingdom.

“The Church instead lives by the light of the Lamb; gathered around him, she is sent out into the world by the power of the Holy Spirit. In this mission, she is constantly called to trust in the Lord’s promise: “Do not be afraid, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom” (Lk 12:32).

You can find more of Gavin's work here: Dr. Gavin Ashenden's Substack

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Contributors

The Church

Trinity

Comments

To view comments or leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

86
Club or Charism?
The feature image of this post captures the joy of hearts completely immersed in loving God through the charism that God has called them to. In this case, the Carmelite nuns of Palencia Spain, with love overflowing towards us as visiting pilgrims, expressed the grace and vigor of their charism through their joyful generosity and the promise of their prayers. The powerful charism that echoes through the love of these holy women has turned the hearts of millions to God. What is a Charism? A charism is a gift of the Holy Spirit given in a particular way to an individual or to a group for the purpose of building up the Kingdom of God, for the good of the Church, and the souls of those engaged in the charism. When it concerns a group, a charism is understood to reflect the distinctive spirituality of the founder or foundress of a religious institute, which then distinguishes a religious family from other forms of consecrated life approved by the Church. A charism is the personality of a religious community bequeathed by the founder. According to the Second Vatican Council, a charism is “the spirit and aims of each founder [which] should be faithfully accepted and retained” (Perfectae Caritatis, 2). In the case of these beautiful souls, their foundress is St. Teresa of Avila. What is a Club? In contrast to a charism, a club, as defined by Merriam-Webster is “an association of persons for some common object usually jointly supported and meeting periodically.” Charisms and clubs have some similarity in that they both have regular meetings, requirements for association, and a particular purpose for the association. However, clubs are a far less consequential form of association in that their membership requirements have little to do with the essence of who the members are, or the way they live their lives. Said another way, clubs meet regularly and have requirements, but they are a far less significant form of association than those inspired by the Holy Spirit for the building up of the Church. Clubs are inconsequential to who the members are in their essence. A charism like Apostoli Viae, for its members who are called to a lifelong association, is essential to their spiritual identity. A charism should be conceived of in a similar vein as a religious order (as with our Carmelite nuns above). In this respect, one area of confusion emerges when religious orders and their “third orders” or lay associations begin to lose the distinctive fire, conviction, and clarity of their founder and degenerate into something that looks and feels more like a pseudo-spiritual club. Accordingly, their members live as if the association is not central to how they live their daily lives - because it is, in fact, not central to their lives. In this unfortunate situation, the once vibrant life-changing charism has lost its fire and has little impact on its members and thus has degenerated into a kind of religious club. Some might be tempted to argue that religious clubs are a good thing. They turn the attention of their members to good and occupy them with good. Though I don't wholly deny this argument's validity, another perspective, one that I hold, is that religious clubs are more damaging than secular ones (that have a positive purpose). Why? Because there is a kind of pretense that the members are following their founder when they are not. The human person has an infinite capacity for self-delusion. The road to heaven is narrow and difficult according to Jesus. Self-delusion regarding one's goodness or spiritual progress because of association with a spiritual club inevitably leads to a kind of self-satisfaction and complacency. Jesus spoke to this problem in Revelation 3:15-16, "I know your works: you are neither cold or hot. Would that you were either cold or hot! So because you are lukewarm, I will spit you out of my mouth." He goes on to reveal that those to whom He offers this stern warning are self-satisfied and self-deluded. What Would It Be Like to Follow St. Teresa of Avila or St. Francis of Assisi in their Time? This dilemma between club and charism often arises within those who are part of a spiritual club and then they discover Apostoli Viae. It is common to hear (just for example sake), "I am a third order Franciscan, can I also be a member of Apostoli Viae?" For purposes of our reflection here, this dilemma does help to make these distinctions more clear. For example, consider what it would have been like to truly follow St. Teresa of Avila when she was leading the Carmelite reform that our nuns in the photo follow with vigor. What would have happened if St. Francis of Assisi was alive at the same time and in the same area? If one were to follow St. Teresa would they also be able to follow St. Francis? This example makes the case more clear because both are vibrant, living calls to specific and very distinct ways of following Jesus. Of course, this request to follow both Teresa and Francis becomes an absurdity because of the profound distinction between the two spiritualities. Yes, they both follow Christ and seek to build up the Church. Yes, they can and have historically helped one another and at times worked side by side in common causes. However, the emphasis and unique charism of each follows a mutually beneficial but exclusive path. When vibrant and alive, each community draws the believer to follow the specific insights, teachings, and way of life of its founder. It would be impossible to follow both. With respect to clubs, we can be members of many at the same time because they don’t demand much of us. If we miss a meeting for one over the other, no big deal. However, it is a big deal if a pseudo-spiritual club draws a member to conflict if they also belong to a vibrant charism. The Degeneration of a Charism A charism degenerates into a club when practices and perspectives central to the founder become secondary or of lesser importance and association is merely a matter of regular meetings usually focused on administrivia or some watered down expression of the original spirituality. As an example, a friend of mine recently completed six years of formation and was received fully and formally into a third order. The founder of this order considered mental prayer as absolutely central to the charism. Said another way, it would be unthinkable to the founder if any expression of their spirituality lacked a deep commitment to mental prayer – especially of a fully professed member. I was surprised and dismayed to discover that this friend was fully received but had yet to begin a daily habit of mental prayer!  How could this be when it was central to the founder? It came to be because the local expression of the order has lost its roots in the founder and has become a kind of dangerous spiritual club that requires little of its members. The spirituality they claim is, without doubt, life-changing when practiced as the founder intended. However, this expression of her group has lost the heart of the founder and has degenerated into a spiritual club that damages the perception of the charism because it offers an expression that in many ways radically denies the essence of the charism it pretends to represent. Even worse, it deceives the participants into the delusion that they are really part of something that can and will help them to deeper union with God and ultimately to heaven. This deeply grievous degeneration of many orders has resulted in their members regularly inquiring into membership with Apostoli Viae. Because of our commitment to serving the whole Church, we wholeheartedly welcome all committed Catholics into relationship as Sojourners. However, to move into deeper association, one must be called and exclusively dedicated to the charism of Apostoli Viae. Our charism is a calling into a community and life that invites our members to be fully immersed in our spirituality and apostolic work. We are deeply committed to Christ and to giving all that we are to Him. We are not a spiritual club. We are an authentic charism that calls for hearts of deep commitment to the Lord and the specific path revealed by the Holy Spirit that Apostoli Viae represents. By God’s mercy, may we never become merely a kind of spiritual club but instead remain a vibrant force to bring about renewal and healing of the Church. Yours in Christ, Dan Burke Unum est Necessarium